| |
Prior to 1990, electricity was treated as an important social tool
in eastern bloc countries. In those economies, the energy sector
played a key role in the central plan. With the fall of the Berlin
Wall and the regions’ transition to a market economy, electricity
became a market commodity like any other. The energy sector was
fundamentally transformed, losing its ties to the Soviet Union and
eventually breaking up into a number of independent entities and
state-controlled utilities.
The
overall energy situation at the time could best be described as
chaotic. Only a few countries had the capacity to produce surplus
energy, while the majority had serious energy deficits. This created
an immediate need for the power utilities to start trading in
electricity among themselves.
However, direct trading between the state utilities was not
happening on normal economic terms. The infrastructure was wholly
inadequate and financial liquidity was poor. As an automatic
response to years of difficulties in the normal commercial cycle of
cross-border power delivery and payment, regional power companies
had institutionalised their mode of operation – either energy was to
be sold on pre-payment terms, or it was to be acquired on
deferred-payment terms – thereby leaving a yawning and insoluble gap
which tended to prevent the wider flow of energy and the smoothing
out of regional imbalances. This led to a situation in which much
needed electricity was rarely delivered and paid for on time.
In
such circumstances, the public utilities of South-East Europe soon
accumulated debts toward their suppliers. The cost of production
exceeded income from sales of electricity, which led to shortages of
electricity and a series of detrimental effects for the regions’
industry and economy.
EFT
was born out of a realisation that a company that could mobilise the
necessary capital to absorb the risks of dealing between the
different utilities could make substantial returns and create a
whole new market. The vision that its founders brought to EFT was
that it would be feasible to treat power flows in the region in the
same way as flows of funds, and to create the much-needed bank or
settlement mechanism through which such flows could occur.
EFT
would build a portfolio of assets comprising an amalgam of pre-paid
energy flows of diverse sorts (base-load and mixed high-tariff and
low-tariff) and would match this against a balanced portfolio of
liabilities towards a mix of different utilities and other power
users.Financing itself in the markets it was thus able to inject
the necessary liquidity that allowed sellers of power to meet their
goals, whilst allowing those who needed energy, but were short of
funds, still to import energy. In due course the local industry
would be enabled to generate sales and the source of funds to settle
energy debts.
Over time, EFT built a client base of loyal clients comprising all
of the regional power utilities, from Ljubljana to Athens, and north
to the markets of central Europe, providing the vitally important
working capital that the regional market had lacked up to that
date.
The
top tier of industry formed the next addition to EFT’s customer
base, and the product range expanded to include short-notice reserve
energy, amongst other innovations aimed at better serving the ever
increasing and complicated requirements of counterparties.
In
line with the regulatory direction pursued in the region, EFT’s
network has constantly expanded, with units now in 18 countries.
Whilst meeting these local requirements, the Group has nevertheless
acted as a constant ambassador for the greater integration of the
south-eastern European market, the dismantling of anti-competitive
barriers and the adoption of market standards from north-western
Europe.
Finally, to provide long-term sources of energy to support its
trading and sales businesses, EFT is now implementing its vision for
the ownership of generation assets, and is developing an energy
generation infrastructure. This development will see the EFT Group
remain one of the most significant contributors to the development
of the electricity markets of central and south-east Europe.
|
|